Issue - meetings
Performance Management Framework - including local indicators
- Share this item
Meeting: 07/03/2005 - Cabinet (Item 116)
116 Performance Management - New Local Indicators/Measures 2005/06
PDF 18 KB
Report number DOS274 by the Director of Operational Services.
(attached)
Additional documents:
Minutes:
DECISION: To amend the targets for the following local indicators:
(1) Street Scene Priority A: Satisfaction with street scene by TCMPs:
To reduce the percentages accordingly: 80% for 2005/06;
82% for 2006/07, and 84% for 2007/08
(2) Communications: No. of editions of Districtline issued: To increase the target for 2005/06 to 4 editions.
(3) Diversity Priority B: % of new applicants for housing from ethinic backgrounds: To delete this local indicator for the time being and to review in 6 months’ time;
(4) That the revised recycling targets approved under the previous minute CO115 be aligned within the Performance Indicators for 2005/06.
Considerations/Reasons for Decision:
(1) Report number DOS274 by the Director of Operational Services explaining that the Council’s ongoing development of its performance management arrangements requires new local indicators/measures to better reflect the priorities. Following the Cabinet’s approval of the draft set of indicators/measures on 10th January 2005, comments were sought from the DSPs, the LSP and the recent round of the Local Area Assemblies;
(2) Details of observations/comments received during the consultation period;
(3) Recommendations made by the Environment DSP that the targets set for the percentage satisfaction with the street scene by the TCMPs is too high;
(4) The original target of 3 editions of Districtline for 2005/06 was set when staffing resources were low. The recent appointment of a PR Manager and the imminent appointment of a Communications Manager should bring the capacity up to meet the quarterly publication target;
(5) The % of new applicants for housing from ethnic backgrounds is considered premature at this stage but will be subject to review in 6 months.
Other options considered and assessed
The existing set of national best value performance indicators does not provide sufficient coverage for the Council to effectively measure its progress