Venue: Council Chamber - South Kesteven House, St. Peter's Hill, Grantham. NG31 6PZ. View directions
Contact: Democratic Services
The Council welcomes engagement from members of the public. To speak at this meeting please register no later than 24 hours prior to the date of the meeting via email@example.com
There were no comments from members of the public.
Apologies for absence
All Committee Members were present.
Councillor Virginia Moran was filling the Alliance SK Vacancy.
Disclosure of Interest
Members are asked to disclose any interest in matters for consideration at the meeting.
There were none.
The minutes of the meeting held on 5 October 2022 were proposed, seconded, and AGREED as a correct record.
One Member raised that within the minutes, it stated that a discussion around affordable housing would take place, it was queried as to whether this took place and what had been discussed.
To receive updates on actions agreed at the previous meeting.
The Committee noted the actions agreed at the meeting held on 5 October 2022.
Further clarification was sought around the status of the ‘Homes for Ukraine’ scheme following the six-month period of Ukrainian families staying in the District. It was queried as to whether they had indefinite leave to remain in the UK. Numbers of families that had been re-housed was also questioned.
The Acting Director of Housing assured the Committee that additional numbers would be forthcoming to the Committee, following the meeting.
It was confirmed that hosting arrangements were continuing. The Council had completed 171 inspections on properties within the District. South Kesteven also remained the largest host District within Lincolnshire and the lowest number of breakdowns between hosts and Ukrainian families.
ACTION: For the Acting Director of Housing to provide further information and numbers on the status of Ukrainian families living in the District following the six-month period.
One Member requested an update from the Housing Working Group.
The Acting Director of Housing noted that another meeting had taken place and an update would be included alongside the Regulatory Compliance item.
The Cabinet Member for Housing and Property clarified that following the closure of Stoke Rochford for a week, it was re-opened and the current contract for families residing at Stoke Rochford was a twelve-month period.
One Member raised a query regarding the funding after the six-month period had ended and whether the funding was still available. Clarification was sought over the types of families staying at Stoke Rochford. It was confirmed the families residing at Stoke Rochford were refugees and Albanian families.
The Acting Director of Housing confirmed that hosting arrangements were still being funded through the Government and the Council were awaiting clarification on the timescale of the funding to end. The Council were continuing to monitor the host and family tensions on a weekly basis and a funded worker was working with the families.
The Chairman highlighted that a ‘Celebrate the Nations’ had taken place where many Ukrainian families attended.
Following a previous comment made, a Member queried the hosting of Ukrainians in Skegness.
The Cabinet Member for Housing and Property clarified that the hosting of Ukrainians in Skegness had been in the media where a question was raised on the impact on Skegness and surrounding area on hotels provisions for other people and to seek an assurance that any more provision would be made at present due to the infrastructure being stretched to capacity.
A Member highlighted that a briefing had been held at Lincolnshire County Council regarding Ukrainian families. It was noted that Ukrainian families were not staying at Stoke Rochford and was being used for refugee families. This was a separate scheme to households hosting Ukrainian families. The Government had not yet announced that the six months stay period would be formally extended, however there was expectation that it would be. It had not yet been decided as to whether the allowance figure would be increased or stay the same. The announcement ... view the full minutes text for item 31.
Announcements or updates from the Leader of the Council, Cabinet Members or the Head of Paid Service
There were none.
One Member expressed concern as to whether there were any updates regarding the Ground Maintenance contract and the depot which affected the HRA.
The Cabinet Member for Housing and Property informed the Committee on items discussed at the Housing Member workshop:
· Members enquires
· Compliance update
· Verbal update on Mould – housing situations
· Voids and number of void turnarounds
· Integrated Housing Management System
· Earlesfield update (weekly update to all Members)
· Grounds Maintenance Contract, in regard to HRA – Consultation going out to tenants
The Deputy Leader of the Council highlighted that the agenda item was present on all Overview and Scrutiny Committees, and updates would be provided when necessary.
One Member requested that the consultation that had been sent out to tenants be given to Members.
The Cabinet Member for Housing and Property confirmed that the consultation questions would be published on Skyline, however, they would be circulated to Committee Members via email.
ACTION: For the Acting Director of Housing to circulate the consultation questions on Grounds Maintenance provided to tenants to Members.
The Cabinet Member for Housing and Property presented the progress report.
The Committee had now received nine update reports since March 2021 that confirmed the Regulatory Notice served on the Council and provided an outline of the work that officers would continue to complete to ensure progress through a programme of improvement. The Committee determined that it wished to receive update reports on progress at each of its meetings to ensure that Members had oversite of broad progress around the key areas of activity and could engage with Officers and scrutinise work where required. It identified the following core headings as a means of updating Members and would identify the following information to assist this process. In addition, at the meeting on 01 July 2021, Committee requested sight of the Improvement Plan; the latest version was appended to this report.
Updating Tenants and Members:
As reported to the Committee’s meeting in June 2022, a full tenant consultation exercise was undertaken – “The Big Listen”. This involved several questions on both the current experience of tenants in terms of the services the Council offered as a landlord and what they would like to see prioritised in the Housing Revenue Account Business Plan, which required a complete review in 2022/23. The questions were based on the Regulator of Social Housing’s proposed Tenant Satisfaction Measures and the initial report was provided to Committee in the meeting on 23 June 2022.
Good practice suggested a comprehensive Stock Condition survey should be completed every 5 years, usually by undertaking a survey of 20% of the stock each year. The Survey has now concluded, and analysis of the findings continued. The Council continued to utilise its Rant and Rave feedback system, seeking real time feedback from tenants following responsive repairs and continued to see overall satisfaction of 4.5 out of 5, demonstrating sustained high satisfaction at the point where repairs are undertaken. An all Councillor briefing on Housing was delivered in November, providing an update on the work ongoing across the teams to provide an understanding of the current priorities, projects and pressures that the team were currently dealing with.
Regular Meetings with the Regulator:
Monthly meetings between the Chief Executive, Acting of Housing and the Regulator’s Officers took place as scheduled. Auditors had started their review recently alongside progress that had been significant right across the landlord health and safety compliance function with the intention that the Audit would endorse compliance. An HSE report on the Riverside complex had been considered and findings concluded too. The relationship with the Regulator was positive, with the Regulator acknowledging that the Council was moving to a position to seek removal of the Notice that was formally served in February 2021.
Leadership Compliance Meetings:
Chaired by Cabinet Member for Housing and Property and attended by the Leader of the Council, the Chief Executive and the Acting Director of Housing, these meetings were a continued feature of the more detailed compliance review process being undertaken. Members of this group ensured ... view the full minutes text for item 33.
This report provides an update on the new Armed Forces Act and the Armed Forces Covenant, implications of those for South Kesteven District Council and aspirations under the Council’s Defence Employer Recognition Scheme Gold Award.
The Community Engagement Manager presented the report providing an update on the new Armed Forces Act and the Armed Forces Covenant, implications for South Kesteven District Council and aspirations under the Council’s Defence Employer Recognition Scheme Gold Award.
The Chairman informed the Committee that on 8 December 2022, the last surviving Dambuster, Johnny Johnson, had sadly passed away at the age of 101.
It was highlighted the recently released census figure revealed that more than 7000 military veterans reside in the District.
The Armed Forces Officer supported the report with a Powerpoint presentation which provided photographs of recent events that had taken place throughout the year.
Committee Members thanked all Officers and Members involved in the hard work around Armed Forces.
Members raised the following points in relation to Armed Forces in South Kesteven:
· That May 2023 will see the 80th anniversary of the ‘Dambusters raid’. It was hoped that authorities in Lincolnshire would take part in the celebration.
· Stamford Welland Academy was one of the few schools in the country that had a combined cadet force.
· South Kesteven was the landlord to the Air Cadets in Stamford.
The Armed Forces Officer highlighted the ‘Dambusters raid’ was coordinated in Grantham at St Vincent’s Hall in 1943. Pre-covid, a series of events were organised, and it was hoped a similar event could take place for the 80th anniversary of the ‘Dambusters raid’.
A query was raised on whether the Warwickshire County Council e-learning training module was due to be rolled out to Councillors also.
It was confirmed the training module was via Warwickshire County Council due to the benefit of networking relationships and collections of good ideas.
An example was requested on what a local business had done to support the Armed Forces.
The Armed Forces Officer documented Grantham had two Gold Award businesses (Recruit Me and TMS). These businesses were being used to encourage other businesses to become involved with the employer recognition scheme and sign up, as part of the action plan for 2023.
One Member raised concern regarding the mental health of former servants residing in South Kesteven and whether the Council offered any support to them. The number of ex-military rough sleepers within the District was queried and whether any support was provided for them. It was further questioned whether jobs would be protected if reservists were called up, as it was believed this was part of legislation.
The Armed Forces Act followed three principles:
· Health/Mental health
The Armed Forces Officer had been involved with mental health groups and peer support breakfast clubs for ex-military individuals. It was highlighted that doctors had been encouraged to sign up to the GP veteran accreditation scheme which allowed GP’s to be aware of health issues as a result of military service with extra training available for practice staff.
One Member invited all present to the British Legion Branch in February where the National Chairman of the Goldfish Club was due to provide ... view the full minutes text for item 34.
This report seeks to update the Committee on the energy efficiency measures being delivered within the Council’s housing stock with the support of grant funding that has been awarded to deliver these improvements. Also to inform the Committee of the recent submission to the Social Housing Decarbonisation Fund (SHDF) by the Council.
The Cabinet Member for Housing and Property presented the report which provided an insight into the energy efficiency measures being delivered to Council tenants. The measures were being delivered through two grant funds and are key for assisting residents in relation to increasing utility costs.
The Local Authority Delivery Phase 2 was match funded for improvements of properties over two years and the Council had enabled a drawdown of £770, 800 at present. The Council had delivered improvements to 164 properties, which had been delivered across two main heating types (electric storage heating - 78 installations and air source heat pumps – 86 installations).
The Social Housing Decarbonisation Funding was a bid of over £7 million, which had been submitted. The grant element equalling £3.4 million, if successful energy efficiency works would be delivered on 333 properties.
The timeline from the Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy would notify the Council by March 2023, if the bid was successful. A further update would be brought back to the Committee when more information was available.
A query was raised on whether the houses fitted with air source heat pumps were proving to be economical to maintain and run.
The Acting Director of Housing confirmed that the air source heat pumps were more efficient regarding the energy they consume to provide heat into the property. A user guide had been shared with tenants due to the air source heat pumps working differently to storage heaters and gas fired central heating systems.
It was hoped that the air source heat pumps would be cheaper and more efficient to run than the systems that had been removed.
One Member raised queries in relation to energy efficiency ratings:
· Whether the upgrading of 330 properties were ratings informed by the stock condition survey.
· how the Council could derive costs from the level of detail of upgrades on properties.
· Whether energy efficiency rating B could be achieved, or whether C (as set out in exempt appendix) was the highest rating achievable.
The Acting Director of Housing responded to the above questions regarding EPC ratings:
· That all properties identified had an EPC completed alongside the stock condition surveys over the past 12-18 months.
· E-on energy were involved in the bid process and each property identified had bespoke packages identified.
· The goal rating of C was due to a regulation in the near future where the Council would require all properties to become a rating of C before they could be re-let once void.
· There were cost floors within the bidding system which prevented the Council to spend more than £18,000 per property in energy efficiency improvements.
Further clarification was sought on the properties that had experienced heating upgrades:
· Whether the heating was more expensive prior to the upgrades.
· Whether the previous means of heating was coal or solid fuel heating.
· Whether the results and performance of the upgrades and systems would be reviewed on a long-term basis through surveys.
· Whether housing stock report would include insulation of ... view the full minutes text for item 35.
This Mid-Year update report outlines South Kesteven District Councils performance against the Corporate Plan Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for the year of 2022/23.
The Deputy Leader of the Council presented the report.
The South Kesteven Corporate Plan 2020-23 was approved by Council on 1 October 2020. It was agreed by Council that actions, key performance indicators (KPIs) and targets were to be developed by the relevant overview and scrutiny committee.
The report provided an update on performance to the mid-year point of the 2022/23 financial year and incorporated the changes recommended by the last KPI review to 3 outline areas of the council’s performance which were successful and to advise where challenges may lay.
The report summary was as follows:
8 of the actions were rated Green. These were actions above target as planned.
2 actions were rated as Amber. These are those off target by less than 10% or where milestone achievement is delayed but with resolution in place to be achieved within a reasonable timeframe.
2 actions were rated Red. These are those falling significantly below target or overdue with no specific resolution date planned.
One Member raised a query on the action relating to CCTV and number of incidents where offenders were arrested as the percentage seemed low. It was queried how many arrests CCTV resulted in prosecution.
ACTION: For the Assistant Director for Operations and Public Protection to provide statistics around the number of arrests that resulted in prosecutions within the District.
One Member had previously attended the meeting of Bourne, Stamford and Deeping Neighbourhood Policing priorities, where SKDC CCTV colleagues were praised for their contribution into assisting Police with target criminals and suspected crime.
One Member made the following comments around the housing actions:
· Why the affordable housing target was rated green, when the target had not been met.
· That the action relating to ‘housing that meets the needs of all residents’ had not met the target of building 650 properties and 244 properties had been built. It was queried as to whether any measures were in place to include background information on latest housing supply.
The Cabinet Member for Housing and Property notified the Committee that planning permission criteria made the delivery of affordable housing schemes more difficult.
Concern was raised over the action rated red regarding proportion of prevention cases successfully resolved of homelessness. It was suggested that a percentage only measure should be reported and related to the size of the population in question.
The Acting Director of Housing highlighted that there were seasonal factors to the action regarding homelessness. 39.06% of prevention cases resolved was the current percentage achieved and the 50% target was a stretched target and could not easily be reached. It was confirmed that figures would be included in future commentary to assist in the understanding of the percentages.
One Member raised concern over the Council the green rated action which outlined the Council embracing the ‘National mental health challenge’ given the recent decision on the Deepings Leisure Centre which had caused mental distress of the residents.
It was queried as to whether action 9 ‘making best use of different ... view the full minutes text for item 36.
This report seeks to update Committee on progress in relation to the implementation of Choice-Based Lettings following the adoption of the Housing Allocation Policy.
The Cabinet Member for Housing and Property presented the report which provided an update on the choice-based lettings system and progress since the Committee and Cabinet adoption of the housing allocation policy. At present, there were 1500 live applications and for the previous financial year, only 327 properties in the Council’s own stock were re-let and 189 from other social housing providers across the District.
The choice-based lettings scheme would assist in enabling the delivery of the best possible service for residents who had applications and would widen the choice and access in being able to bid for properties.
The Council had undertaken a compliant procurement process and were submitting the contract award for consideration at the next Cabinet meeting, if approved, the system would go live in the second quarter of 2023.
It was clarified that the system would be a standalone choice-based letting system and would not coincide with the integrated housing management system.
Concern was raised in relation to the implementation of the choice-based lettings system and the fact that non-urgent cases would need to re-register with the new system. It was queried as to whether a data conversion could take place from the old system to the new system. It was suggested that the Council contacts tenants that have already registered to ensure they would be put onto the new system.
The Acting Director of Housing confirmed that the re-registration process would not include contacting tenants that were already registered and asking for their details. The re-registration would include verifying the current information held to ensure that it was correct, which could be completed online, in person or over the phone.
Concern was raised over the scrutiny process of the report, where a further report would be taken to Cabinet.
1. That the Committee notes the latest progress of the choice-based lettings process and that full procurement procedures have been followed.
2. The Committee recommends to Cabinet the procurement of the ChoiceBased Lettings system to meet the requirements of our Housing Allocations Policy.
To receive the Work Programme for 2022-2023
The Committee noted the Work Programme 2022 – 2023.
One Member queried as to whether a crime and disorder meeting date had been put into place.
It was requested that the following items be included for consideration at a future Committee meeting:
· Crime and disorder
· Effectiveness of affordable housing
· Update on mould management
The Chairman highlighted that she had been in regular contact with the new policing team and would raise the idea of arranging a crime and disorder meeting.
The Cabinet Member for Housing and Property confirmed that a written response would be provided regarding effectiveness of affordable housing.
ACTION: For the Acting Director of Housing to provide a written response on effectiveness of affordable housing.
ACTION: For the Acting Director of Housing to provide a written response on voids.
Any other business which the Chairman, by reason of special circumstances, decides is urgent
There was no other business.
Close of Meeting
The Chairman closed the meeting at 16:45.