Agenda item

BUDGET 2007/8

Minutes:

 

The Panel scrutinised report CHFR29, which contained proposals for the 2007/8 budget.

 

  • Budget management would be devolved to Service Managers. Virements would be controlled on a corporate level by Financial Services and adhere to financial regulations.
  • A report would be submitted to Cabinet on 5th March 2007 on settling the pension capital costs in advance of the triennial review due in April 2007. Costs could be settled on a year-by-year basis or split over three years. The council would be charged interest if payment was split over three years.

 

ACTION POINT:

 

The Resources DSP will scrutinise the report on settling the pension capital costs at their meeting on 15th March 2007.

 

  • A new nationally negotiated pension scheme would be introduced from 2008. There would be limited local flexibilities.

 

ACTION POINT:

 

At the first meeting of the newly appointed Resources DSP following the 2007 District Council elections, a presentation should be given on the new local government pension scheme.

 

  • A 2% salary efficiency was required. Service managers would be presented with the reduced figure. Efficiencies would be monitored on a corporate level because of variation in staff turnover between sections.

 

ACTION POINT:

 

A numerical breakdown of staff efficiencies should be supplied for consideration at the Cabinet meeting on 12th March 2007.

 

  • Managers would be encouraged to project when spending would take place. Profiled budgets would facilitate reviewing capital programme delivery.
  • Salary inflation for 2007/8 had been estimated at 2.5%, in line with guidance. Additional posts and increases in grade had been incorporated in service planning.
  • A one-off bid for funding had been made for “Communications Priorities”. This was for Gateway signs to the district and media training.

 

CONCLUSION:

 

Panel members expressed their concern to Cabinet on the bid for one-off budget provision for “Communications Priorities”, and that this bid should be removed.

 

  • A report was to be prepared on Special Expense Areas to assess whether the net expenditure was fully recovered.

 

ACTION POINT:

 

At the first meeting of the newly appointed Resources DSP following the 2007 District Council elections, the report on Special Expense Areas should undergo pre-decision scrutiny.

 

  • The Community DSP had requested information on the Building Control Reserve. Scrutiny of this could be referred to the Resources DSP.
  • There were concerns that any Local Area Agreement could require the aligning of funds between all councils in Lincolnshire. The District Council would need to look into rationalising funding streams.
  • Grant funding of £10,000 for 2006/7 and £52,000 for 2007/8 had been received for the implementation of smoke-free legislation.
  • Local Forums had been consulted on proposed increases in council tax. Of the five that had taken place, three were in favour of an increase of 4.9%, one was in favour of an increase of 2.5% and the final one was closely balanced.
  • No formal guidance on capping had been received. Informal guidance stated that there was no power for the government to cap district councils on the basis of parish councils.

 

CONCLUSION:

 

Members of the Resources DSP acknowledged that the district council was working within current legislation but were not reassured by the legislative position.

 

  • Rent increases were in-line with the RPI. The maximum rent increase would be 4.1% plus £2.00 in individual cases.
  • Resources DSP had already requested that a fundamental review of all fees and charges should be carried out and reviewed then annually.

 

ACTION POINT:

 

Reports required under recommendations f, h and i should be submitted to the Resources DSP for scrutiny.

 

CONCLUSIONS:

 

1.                  The Resources DSP fully endorsed the contents of report CHFR29 on the Budget 2007/8 to the Cabinet with the caveat that, under recommendation f (ii), funding for communications priorities should be removed.

2.                  The Portfolio Holder should present the budget within the normal standing orders of the Council (Part 4 section 14.4 of the District Council’s constitution) and the Section 151 Officer should present the detailed budget.