Issue - meetings
Invitation for representations regarding the Structural Changes Order for Local Government Reorganisation in Greater Lincolnshire: Response
- Subscribe to updates
- Share this item
Meeting: 09/06/2026 - Cabinet (Item 16)
To consider the proposed response on behalf of
South Kesteven District Council to the Ministry of Housing,
Communities & Local Government (MHCLG) invitation for
representations regarding the Structural Changes Order for Local
Government Reorganisation in Greater Lincolnshire.
Additional documents:
- Appendix A – Letter from MHCLG to Greater Lincolnshire Chief Executives inviting representations for the detailed contents of the Structural Changes Order, 19 May 2026, item 16
PDF 264 KB
- Appendix B – Joint Representations from North Kesteven DC and South Kesteven DC regarding the Structural Changes Order for Greater Lincolnshire, item 16
PDF 112 KB
- Webcast for Invitation for representations regarding the Structural Changes Order for Local Government Reorganisation in Greater Lincolnshire: Response
Decision:
Decision
That Cabinet:
1. Approve the proposed responses to the MHCLG invitation for representations on the contents of the Structural Changes Order, as set out at Appendix B of this report, and instruct the Chief Executive to submit the responses on behalf of the Council prior to the deadline of 16 June 2026.
- Delegate authority to the Chief Executive, in consultation with the Leader of the Council, to make minor inconsequential amendments to the content of the response between now and 16 June 2026.
Reasons for the decision
The Government had invited the Council to make representations on the detailed contents of the Structural Change Order (SCO). These representations would inform the considerations of the Secretary of State and thus represented an opportunity for the Council to attempt to ensure that the SCO was properly tailored to the particular circumstances of Greater Lincolnshire.
Other options considered
The Council was under no explicit legal obligation to submit a response. However, the Council understood that representations would inform the Secretary of State’s considerations on the detailed contents of the Structural Change Order. Therefore, if the Council does not submit a response, it would lose an opportunity to potentially influence the government on key elements of the future transitional and electoral arrangements.
Minutes:
Decision
That Cabinet:
1. Approve the proposed responses to the MHCLG invitation for representations on the contents of the Structural Changes Order, as set out at Appendix B of this report, and instruct the Chief Executive to submit the responses on behalf of the Council prior to the deadline of 16 June 2026.
- Delegate authority to the Chief Executive, in consultation with the Leader of the Council, to make minor inconsequential amendments to the content of the response between now and 16 June 2026.
Other options considered
The Council was under no explicit legal obligation to submit a response. However, the Council understood that representations would inform the Secretary of State’s considerations on the detailed contents of the Structural Change Order. Therefore, if the Council does not submit a response, it would lose an opportunity to potentially influence the government on key elements of the future transitional and electoral arrangements.
Reasons for the decision
The Leader of the Council introduced the report.
The Government had invited the Council to make representations on the detailed contents of the Structural Change Order (SCO). These representations would inform the considerations of the Secretary of State and thus represented an opportunity for the Council to attempt to ensure that the SCO was properly tailored to the particular circumstances of Greater Lincolnshire.
On 19 May 2026, MHCLG wrote to all councils in Greater Lincolnshire to seek views on matters that would be necessary for the Secretary of State to consider in any Structural Changes Order (SCO) (Appendix A). A SCO was a statutory instrument (secondary legislation) that would establish a new unitary authority, make provision to abolish predecessor councils, and set out transitional and electoral arrangements.
The matters/questions on which the Council had been invited to make representations were:
- Whether you prefer a preparing council and implementation executive model (where geographies align) or a new council model with a joint committee?
- How many members from each relevant council would you prefer to sit on each Joint Committee or on the Implementation Executive, including the balance of members from different councils?
- Would you prefer for any individuals to be specified for the Chair/Deputy Chair roles, and if so, who?
- What are your views on any requirement for political balance in the joint committee(s)/ implementation executive?
- Who should be the returning officer for the first election to each of the new unitary councils, that proposals would see established.
- What are your preferences for the membership of the Implementation Team and whether roles should be specified?
- Would you prefer for any parish council elections to be aligned with elections to the new councils?
- What are the current legal names of the councils and what are your preferred names for new councils?
- If different to proposals, has there been any further modelling of your preferred councillors for each new councils that you would like the Secretary of State to consider, alongside any information on the rationale for the numbers?
- What are your suggested wards, that reflect the proposal and ... view the full minutes text for item 16