Agenda and minutes

Venue: Council Chamber - South Kesteven House, St. Peter's Hill, Grantham. NG31 6PZ

Contact: Democratic Services 

Note: Decision implemented date (provided no call-in) - 28 September 2023 

Media

Items
No. Item

19.

Introduction to the meeting

  • Share this item

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Prior to the commencement of business, Members of Cabinet and those others present stood for a minute’s silence to mark the recent passing of their colleague, Councillor Ray Wootten.

20.

Apologies for absence

  • Share this item

Additional documents:

Minutes:

There were no apologies for absence.

 

Councillor Patsy Ellis was acting as Cabinet Member for Environment and Waste for the meeting, under the job share arrangement with Councillor Rhys Baker.

 

21.

Minutes of the previous meeting pdf icon PDF 169 KB

  • Share this item

Minutes of the meeting held on 11 July 2023.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The minutes of the meeting held on 11 July 2023 were approved as a correct record.

22.

Disclosure of Interests

  • Share this item

Additional documents:

Minutes:

There were no disclosures of interests.

23.

Proposed Replacement Depot Turnpike Close Grantham pdf icon PDF 373 KB

Cabinet is asked to consider the proposals and agree next steps to enable the development of a new depot at Turnpike Close in Grantham.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Purpose of report

 

To consider the proposals and agree the next steps to enable the development of a new depot at Turnpike Close in Grantham.

 

Decision

 

To recommend to Council:

 

1.    That an allocation of £8million be included in the General Fund Capital Programme to provide funding to construct a new depot at Turnpike Close, Grantham.

 

2.    A delegation of authority to the Council’s Section 151 Officer, in consultation with the Leader and Deputy Leader of the Council, to allocate further funding if required due to unforeseen costs during the project.

 

3.    A request that the Finance and Economic Overview and Scrutiny Committee adds the replacement depot to its work programme and establishes a working group to receive regular updates and monitor the project.

 

Alternative options considered and rejected

 

Option 1 - To do nothing, not approve the budget for the construction of a new depot and remain at Alexandra Road. This had been discounted due to the growth of the District as identified in the Local Plan and the inability of the existing site to meet growth demands.

 

Option 2 – Investigate whether Alexandra Road (under the ownership of South Kesteven District Council) could be re- modelled to reconfigure the site.

 

Option 3 – Sell the Turnpike Close site and look for another site to purchase.

 

Reasons for decision

 

The site was chosen and purchased as the ideal situation for a replacement depot. The costs for the scheme were volatile but the building of the site was a priority due to potential changes in the Environment Act.

 

The Council needed to find an alternative provision for delivering its statutory function of this service. The site at Alexandra Road was geographically constrained and therefore could not accommodate any further service growth to meet future operational needs as identified in the Local Plan.

 

The welfare facilities did not meet modern standards for the Council’s workforce. A new facility would provide drying areas, new locker provisions as well as canteen and training facilities. The training room could be used by officers and Members providing a multipurpose space.

 

The ability to maximise sustainable systems so that the operational cost of the facility was lower showed a progressive approach working towards a carbon reduction target of 30% by 2030 and zero carbon by 2050.

 

The Leader of the Council and Cabinet Member for Property and Public Engagement highlighted several key points on the depot:

 

·         An options appraisal on the Alexandra Road site still needed to be undertaken.

·         The Lincolnshire County Council waste recycling centre must remain on the Alexandra Road site until at least April 2025 so as not to disrupt crucial services.

·         The priority of delivering a new depot was highlighted in the Corporate Plan when it was being drafted in 2020, under the priority ‘building a fit for purpose depot’. The current site was not fit for purpose and had no capacity for key areas such as welfare facilities and the workshop to expand into.

·         The Design team had worked on plans  ...  view the full minutes text for item 23.

24.

Proposals for the upgrading of District Council street lights to LED units pdf icon PDF 175 KB

This report provides an overview regarding South Kesteven District Council’s potential to upgrade District Council operated streetlights to energy efficient LED units.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Purpose of report

 

An overview regarding South Kesteven District Council’s potential to upgrade District Council operated streetlights to energy efficient LED (Light Emitting Diode) units.

 

Decision

 

1.     Cabinet recommended to Council the allocation of funding of £1 million to accelerate the replacement of the Council operated streetlights with LED energy efficiency lamps. The scheme to be funded as follows:

o   £500k Invest to Save Reserve

o   £250k Budget Stabilisation Reserve

o   £250k Local Priorities Reserve

 

2.    Cabinet requested that Environment Overview and Scrutiny Committee review the current Street Lighting Policy with regard to further reducing energy costs at specific times and locations.

 

Alternative options considered and rejected

 

Option 1: Accelerate programme to upgrade all existing lights to LED. Indicative costs were obtained to upgrade all possible streetlight units to LED within a year of contract commencement. This included an allocation for the potential upgrade of obsolete street light columns where required, estimated at 5% of the total stock of lights. A dimming schedule between midnight and 6am was assumed, where lights were dimmed to 50% of full illumination, in line with current policy. An overall energy saving by upgrading to LED with 6 hours of dimming of 63% was assumed based on supplier projections.

 

Option 2: Accelerate programme to upgrade all existing lights to LED and implement policy to switch off lighting between midnight to 6am. This option used the same assumptions as Option 1, but rather than using the existing dimming profile assumed streetlights would be dark between midnight and 6am, with an assumed energy saving of 75%.

 

Option 3: Review provision of streetlighting with the aim to upgrade every other unit to LED and decommission remaining units. The potential to reduce the overall stock of streetlights which the Council had the responsibility to illuminate had also been explored.

 

Regarding option 3, consideration would need to be made on the placement of individual lamps to ensure the remaining provision of lighting was adequate around decommissioned columns. Once agreed, the Council would need to remove fuses from streetlights to be decommissioned at a cost per lamp. The lamps would remain liable for a standing charge for electricity when not in use. Once the light was declared as obsolete, the Council was obliged by the National Grid to potentially disconnect and remove lighting columns after a 2-year period, at a further cost. The Council also had a duty of care to ensure the obsolete lighting column was inspected annually to ensure they remained safe. Finally, adequate signage would need to be added to every lighting column decommissioned, to help minimise the number of reports to the Council of faulty lights. Given the number of impediments to decommissioning and removing lamps, detailed costs had not been provided to Cabinet.

 

Option 4: The Council could choose not to pursue a proactive programme of LED upgrades. This would require no upfront investment and lamps would only be replaced by LED when a streetlight has failed. This would mean a significantly longer programme of replacement  ...  view the full minutes text for item 24.

25.

Housing Revenue Account Acquisitions Capital Budget pdf icon PDF 142 KB

To seek support and a recommendation to Council to amend the 2023/24 Housing Revenue Account (HRA) capital allocation of Housing Development Investment by an additional £1m to be able to respond promptly to opportunities to purchase properties to increase the Council’s housing stock.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Purpose of report

 

To recommend to Council the amendment of the 2023/2024 Housing Revenue Account (HRA) capital allocation of Housing Development Investment by an additional £1m to be able to respond promptly to opportunities to purchase properties to increase the Council’s housing stock.

 

Decision

 

That Cabinet recommended to Council the amendment of the Housing Revenue Account 2023/2024 Capital Programme Housing Development Investment by an additional £1m.

 

Alternative options considered and rejected

 

The Council could have decided not to purchase any additional properties. This would not have met the housing needs priority of the Corporate Plan and would not have supported the pipeline of delivering new housing in the District.

 

Reasons for decision

 

The decision enabled the increase of the housing stock to meet the needs of South Kesteven’s residents. The Council currently loses around 40 units per year through the ‘right to buy’ scheme.

 

The £3 million capital programme had already been committed towards two new-build schemes at Swinegate in Grantham and Elizabeth Road in Stamford.

 

If possible, the Council wanted to develop a hybrid approach of building their own units and also purchasing from larger, existing developments. The additional budget would give the flexibility to do this.

 

The following points were raised during discussion:

 

·       The additional £1m of funding was for the period from now for the remainder of the financial year.

·       There was a need for social housing across the district and on a national level.

·       The Council were coming to the end of their Housing Regulatory Compliance period and once out of this period would have more options to increase their housing stock.

·       A number of housing associations who were registered providers of social housing were finding themselves in a difficult position with the increase in interest rates, as they found it harder to purchase and manage properties on larger developments. This funding enabled the Council to take opportunities in the housing market when they arose.

·       The £1 million of funding was taken from the Housing Revenue Account (HRA), and would not affect Council Tax rates.

26.

Contract Awards in relation to social landlord responsibilities pdf icon PDF 140 KB

This report is for the contract award for installation of new fire doors and associated safety works identified as part of the fire door inspection programme.

 

This award is to complement the award for compartmentation works which was approved at Cabinet on 30 May 2023.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Purpose of report

 

This report was for the contract award for installation of new fire doors and associated safety works identified as part of the fire door inspection programme.

 

This award would complement the award for compartmentation works approved at Cabinet on 30 May 2023.

 

Decision

 

Cabinet approved the direct award of a contract for Fire Door and associated works via the CPC East England regional lot to Global HSE Solutions Ltd. for a two-year period with the option for two one-year extensions. The estimated contract value was £500,000 per annum for the life of the contract.

 

Alternative options considered and rejected

 

There were no other options available.

 

Reasons for decision

 

The proposed contract award had followed compliant procurement processes and would provide the Council with the appropriate contracts to aid the Council on delivering their Corporate Priority to provide “Housing that meets the needs of all residents”.

 

The award of the contract was aimed at protecting council tenants and aiming to ensure that the Council remained free of any regulations imposed as part of the Housing Regulatory Compliance.

27.

Control Room Relocation pdf icon PDF 186 KB

To seek approval to relocate the Control Room to the Grantham Police Station.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Purpose of report

 

The relocation of the Control Room (containing CCTV) to the Grantham Police Station.

 

Decision

 

That Cabinet:

 

1.    Approved the relocation of the Control Room to the Grantham Police Station.

 

2.    Approved a budget amendment of £16,800 to be funded from the Council’s Local Priorities Reserve.

 

 

Alternative options considered and rejected

 

The Control Room could have remained at its current location, but this would have impacted on any future options for Alexandra Road if the depot relocation was to be approved at Full Council.

 

The Control Room could be included in the new depot site, but this would remove the benefits that came with sharing the Police Station site.

 

Reasons for decision

 

The relocation of the Control Room would remove the limitations of the current location, increase partnership working with the Police and would also bring a number of benefits to the Council, such as:

 

·       Reduced timeline for the Police to review CCTV footage

·       Reduced lone working as the CCTV operatives would be based at the

Police Station

·       Provision of modern facilities for the CCTV operatives

·       Reduction in operating costs from the current location

 

There was a requirement to sign a 20-year lease agreement, but this came at no cost to the Council.

28.

Comprehensive Masterplan for Local Plan allocation at Low Road, Barrowby pdf icon PDF 284 KB

To seek approval from Cabinet for the submitted Comprehensive Masterplan document for the Local Plan residential development site allocation at Low Road, Barrowby (Local Plan Ref: LV-H3).

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Purpose of report

 

To approve the Comprehensive Masterplan document for the Local Plan residential development site allocation at Low Road, Barrowby.

 

Decision

 

Cabinet approved the proposed Comprehensive Masterplan (dated June 2023) (Revision Q) enclosed at Appendix 1 of the report as the agreed Masterplan for the Low Road, Barrowby Local Plan allocation.

 

Alternative options considered and rejected

 

The alternative of not approving the submitted Comprehensive Masterplan had been discounted. Failure to approval the Masterplan document would have resulted in the planning applications for the remaining parcels of the site allocation being determined in the absence of an agreed masterplan, and this may have resulted in the applications being deemed contrary to the Local Plan policy requirements. This may also have resulted in planning permission being delayed and/or withheld for the site allocation.

 

This course of action would have implications for the Council in respect of the requirement to maintain a 5-year housing land supply and, as a result, could have led to planning applications for speculative development within the District. Similarly, it may have also resulted in appeals against the refusal/non-determination of planning applications for the remaining site allocation, and the Council may have been liable for costs incurred for defending any decision.

 

Reasons for decision

 

The submitted masterplan document was approved to ensure that there was an agreed masterplan for the Low Road, Barrowby Local Plan allocation, which would ensure the comprehensive and co-ordinated delivery of the remainder of the site allocation. This was important because it assisted in ensuring the Council met its corporative objectives in respect of delivering housing that meets the needs of all residents, through the delivery of high-quality, well-designed developments.

 

The Low Road, Barrowby was within the adopted Local Plan for a development of up to 270 dwellings. There were three parcels of land under three different developers; Persimmon Homes, Allison Homes, and Platform Housing. The Comprehensive Masterplan was the result of extensive engagement between officers, developers and the local community and had included formal consultation with Barrowby Parish Council, local residents and statutory consultees; this would ensure that the site was developed in a holistic and co-ordinated manner. The consultation had identified that the Masterplan had support.

 

The County Councillor for Barrowby was present and highlighted to Cabinet that there had been good communication with both Persimmon and Allison Homes prior to their houses being built. Platform Housing had built their planned house and supermarket prior to the agreement of the Masterplan. They had however listened to subsequent design concerns. The potential loss of Section 106 monies as a result of this would be raised through the relevant Council channels.

 

The Council was in continued discussion with Barrowby Parish Council with regard to Persimmon and Allison Homes. The Masterplan was not the end of the process; future applications coming forward for planning permission would have to take into account Section 106 funding.

29.

State of the District Report 2023 pdf icon PDF 145 KB

This report presents to Cabinet the State of the District Report 2023.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Purpose of report

 

To present to Cabinet the State of the District report.

 

Decision

 

Cabinet approved the State of the District Report 2023.

 

Alternative options considered and rejected

 

Not producing or publicly releasing the State of the District Report 2023.

 

Reasons for decision

 

The release of the State of the District Report 2023 (‘the Report’) provided a useful resource for all stakeholders: partner, businesses, civil society organisations and members of the public, whether resident to the district or beyond who wished to learn more about South Kesteven. All the information included in the State of the District Report was publicly available, but this report was a coherent and factually accurate one that was proposed to be updated annually. It also aided the Council’s Corporate Plan.

 

The Report was updated annually to reflect the overall state of the district. It provided an up to date, balanced, objective view of performance across South Kesteven and highlighted the characteristics of the area whilst also outlining the strategic challenges that the district faced. These four key long-term strategic challenges could be summarised as:

 

1.    Economic underperformance relative to neighbouring areas

2.    Persistent pockets of severe deprivation

3.    Increasingly aged population

4.    Leading the district in tackling the climate emergency

 

Included was a suite of socio-economic indicators that corresponded to areas where the Council wished to see change.

 

The following points were raised during discussion:

 

·       This document was the type of evidence that would be useful in a forum such as the Health Scrutiny Committee at Lincolnshire County Council.

·       Many of the sources of data had information that was broken down to below Ward level, known as ‘super lower output areas’. This could be made available by officers.

·       The level of Gross disposable household income (GDHI) was the amount of money that all of the individuals in a household had available for spending or saving after they have paid all direct and indirect taxes and received any direct benefits. The level of GDHI per head in South Kesteven was the highest in Lincolnshire.

·       This document was already being used by officers as part of the new Corporate Plan.

·       The Office for Local Government (OFLOG) performance indicators also fed into this Report. These performance indicators also assisted, for example, with Levelling Up funding from the government. A specific study and discussion on the Earlsfield Estate in Grantham had commenced with the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities (DLUHC); South Kesteven was ‘Grade 3’ in the levelling up gradings, which meant that it was difficult to access funding. The level of detail in the Report would mean that any hidden deprivation in areas such as Earlsfield could be highlighted.

·       The Report would be made available in full to all members of the Council.

30.

Refreshed Corporate Values pdf icon PDF 251 KB

  • Share this item

To provide Cabinet with an update on the refresh of South Kesteven District Council’s corporate values and the activity that has taken place to identify potential new values. The report seeks approval from Cabinet of the proposed new values, as recommended by Employment Committee.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Purpose of report

 

An update on the refresh of South Kesteven District Council’s corporate values and the activity that had taken place to identify potential new values. The proposed new values had been recommended by Employment Committee.

 

Decision

 

Cabinet approved the new Corporate Values of Trust, Empowerment, Accountability, Making a Difference, Supportive to All and Kindness.

 

Alternative options considered and rejected

 

Other popular options for proposed values included:

 

At #TeamSK:

·         We care

·         We’re fair

·         We make it happen

 

And:

 

·         We’re positive

·         We trust

·         We make a difference

·         #TheTeamSKWay

 

The consensus was that the chosen proposed values encompassed the Council most accurately and the acronym style made the values memorable.

 

Reasons for decision

 

The values combined feedback from the employee and member workshops. In total, more than 200 individuals were involved in providing feedback on Corporate Values. The Values were unanimously recommended by Employment Committee in June 2023.

 

A new set of values would form the basis of recruitment, policies and processes as a consistent focus on nurturing the desired culture.

 

The layout of the log was as follows:

 

A purple letters on a white background Description automatically generated with medium confidence

31.

Key and Non-Key Decisions taken under Delegated Powers pdf icon PDF 100 KB

  • Share this item

This report provides an overview of decisions taken by individual Cabinet Members since the last meeting of the Cabinet on 11 July 2023.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Key and Non-Key Decisions taken since the previous meeting of Cabinet on 11 July were noted.

32.

Cabinet's Forward Plan pdf icon PDF 175 KB

  • Share this item

This report highlights matters on the Cabinet’s Forward Plan.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Cabinet Forward Plan was noted.

 

The meeting closed at 3:16pm.