Agenda and minutes

Apologies for absence had been received from Councillors Paul Fellows, Ian Stokes, Vanessa Smith and Sarah Trotter.

Councillor Bridget Ley substituted for Councillor Vanessa Smith

Councillor Phil Gadd disclosed a personal interest on applications S23/1417 and S23/1501, however, he would consider the applications with an open mind.

The minutes of the meeting held on 19 January 2024 were proposed, seconded and AGREED as a correct record.

Proposal: Conversion of existing outbuildings to create a detached residential annexe.

Location: Old School House Corby Road Irnham Lincolnshire NG33 4JB

Recommendation: To authorise the Assistant Director – Planning to GRANT planning permission, subject to conditions.

Proposal: Conversion of existing outbuildings to create a detached residential annexe.

Location: Old School House Corby Road Irnham Lincolnshire NG33 4JB

Recommendation: To authorise the Assistant Director – Planning to GRANT planning permission, subject to conditions.

Noting comments in the public speaking session by:

Applicant                                         Trevor Simmons

Together with:

·                Provisions within SKDC Local Plan 2011-2036, Design Guidelines for Rutland and South Kesteven (Design Guide SPD) and National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).

·                Comments received from Inrham Parish Council.

·                LCC Highways & SuDS Support.

·                Comments received from Conservation Consultant.

·                No comments received from Heritage Lincolnshire.

·                Comments received from Historic England. 

During questions to Public Speakers, Members commented on:

·       Clarification over the use of the annex.

The application clarified that the annex would be utilised for family use only and would not be let, sold or used as an Airbnb.

During questions to Officers and debate, Members commented on:

·       It was noted that Highways had no objections in relation to the safety of the access. It was queried whether the Officer was satisfied with the opinion of Highways.

Highways had raised no objections to the use of the annex and site traffic was minimal.

Members observed the old pan tiles on the roof of the existing kennels on the site visit. A condition could be included whereby the old pan tiles could be reused where the dwelling was public facing.

·       Clarification was sought over the use of the annex and whether it could be used as a separate dwelling.

The Planning Officer confirmed that a condition outlined the use of the annex and ensured that it could not be severed or used as a separate dwelling. It would be used in connection and ancillary to the existing dwelling.

·       Concern was raised on whether the proposal outlined a condition on to restrict the annex from being let out or becoming an Airbnb.

Condition 3 included a restriction on the annex being leased/let, sold or used separately and remains ancillary to the occupants.

·       Clarification was sought on what grounds the application was called in by a Ward Councillor.

The Planning Officer highlighted that there had been an objection from a local resident in terms of the site, which were outlined within the report.

Members noted that the proposal would improve the footprint as a result of the outbuildings being demolished, as they did not fit within the rest of the area.

·       Concern was raised on parking around the site of the proposed annex and that it may encroach on the access to the site.

It was proposed that the internal kennels would be removed to improve the width of the drive for cars. Highways had not raised any objection and had stated the site had sufficient parking to the front of the site and the driveway.

·       Clarification was sought around the retention of the gate at the access opening to the site.

It was proposed, seconded and AGREED to authorise the Assistant Director – Planning to GRANT planning permission, subject to conditions.

Time Limit for Commencement  ...  view the full minutes text for item 99.

Proposal: Conversion of existing outbuildings to create a detached residential annexe.

Location: Old School House Corby Road Irnham Lincolnshire NG33 4JB

Recommendation: To authorise the Assistant Director – Planning to GRANT listed building consent, subject to conditions.

Proposal: Conversion of existing outbuildings to create a detached residential annexe.

Location: Old School House Corby Road Irnham Lincolnshire NG33 4JB

Recommendation:To authorise the Assistant Director – Planning to GRANT listed building consent, subject to conditions.

Together with:

·       Provisions within SKDC Local Plan 2011-2036, Design Guidelines for Rutland and South Kesteven (Design Guide SPD) and National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).

·       Comments received from Inrham Parish Council.

·       Comments received from Conservation Consultant.

·       No comments received from Heritage Lincolnshire.

·       Comments received from Historic England. 

It was proposed, seconded and AGREED to authorise the Assistant Director – Planning to GRANT listed building consent, subject to conditions.

Time Limit for Commencement

1. The works hereby consented shall be commenced before the expiration of three years from the date of this consent.

Reason: In order to ensure that the works are commenced in a timely manner, as set out in Sections 18 and 74 of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 (as amended).

1.1             Approved Plans

2) The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following list of approved plans:

i.       Location Plan re.1335.7A received 14 August 2023

ii.      Amended proposed Floor and Elevations re. 1335.6B received 21 November 2023

Unless otherwise required by another condition of this permission.

Reason: To define the permission and for the avoidance of doubt.

  Before the Development is Commenced

3)  Notwithstanding the details submitted, before any of the works on the external elevations of the buildings hereby permitted are begun, details (samples upon request) of the materials to be used shall have been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The development shall then be completed in accordance with the approved details prior to first occupation.

Reason: To ensure a satisfactory external appearance which would continue to preserve and enhance the significance and setting of the listed buildings in accordance with Local Plan Policy EN6.

Proposal: Erection of three storey townhouse to provide 1 (no) flat following partial demolition of existing building

Location: 20 Swinegate, Grantham

Recommendation: To authorise the Assistant Director – Planning to GRANT planning permission, subject to conditions.

Proposal: Erection of three storey townhouse to provide 1 (no) flat following partial demolition of existing building

Location: 20 Swinegate, Grantham

Recommendation: To authorise the Assistant Director – Planning to GRANT planning permission, subject to conditions.

Together with:

·       Provisions within South Kesteven Local Plan 2011-2036, Design Guidelines for Rutland and South Kesteven Supplementary Document, National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).

·       No comments received from Anglian Water.

·       No comments received from Environment Agency.

·       No comments received from Grantham Civic Society.

·       Comments received from Heritage Lincolnshire.

·       Comments received from Historic England.

·       Comments received from Lincolnshire County Council (Highways & SuDS).

·       Comments received from Ministry of Defence.

·       Comments received from SKDC Conservation Consultee.

·       No comments received from SKDC Environmental Protection.

During questions to Officers and debate, Members commented on:

·       That significant concern had been raised from the Conservation Officer with regard to possible damage to the material during works taking place. It was queried whether any mitigations could be put into place with regard to materials.

The Planning Officer highlighted that condition 3 related to a method statement being provided which will submit details on how the structure will be propped up during partial demolition.

Condition 9 required the Applicant to provide further details in terms of the extent of brickwork that was due to be salvaged from the demolition and replaced or whether it would be new brickwork to be integrated within the front facade.

·       It was queried whether a condition could be included to reopen two windows that were window taxed.

The Planning Officer outlined that this was a separate part of the scheme and the proposal would need to be considered as it was. Officer’s had deemed the proposal acceptable.

·       Whether the building had previously been listed.

The building itself was not formally listed, it was a non-designated heritage asset because it was considered to be an attractive building.

·       Clarification was sought on whether the conditions fully covered the Conservation Officer’s comments. The Conservation Officer had requested to see samples of any proposed replacement bricks in advance.

It was confirmed that the condition required the Applicant to provide details in terms of the extent of salvage brickwork utilised from the demolition and a plan demonstrating the extent of works that will utilise the salvage brickwork taken from the site. This would be subject to the approval of the Conservation Officer.

·       Whether localised repairs could be carried out of using reclaimed bricks due to falling damage to the front elevation.

The Planning Officer highlighted that assessments had demonstrated that damage to the side elevations, where the brickwork was very weak. The concern was around significant issues if the side elevations were due to be retained and rebuilt. Whereas, the extent of damaged brickwork on the front elevation was more reduced.

·       A query was raised on what the window and door treatment would be on the ground floor of the dwelling.

It was confirmed that the roof and roofline would be as per agreed on the original application.

·       Whether the proposal was within the  ...  view the full minutes text for item 101.

Proposal: Change of use of informal open space to residential garden including partial fence realignment (retrospective)

Location: 12 Linden Rise, Bourne, PE10 9TD

Recommendation: To authorise the Assistant Director – Planning to GRANT planning permission, subject to conditions.

Proposal: Change of use of informal open space to residential garden including partial fence realignment (retrospective)

Location: 12 Linden Rise, Bourne, PE10 9TD

Recommendation: To authorise the Assistant Director – Planning to GRANT planning permission, subject to conditions.

Together with:

·       Provisions within SKDC Local Plan 2011-2036, National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).

·       Comments received from Ward Councillor.

·       Comments received from Parish Council.

·       Comments received from LCC Highways & SuDS.

During questions to Officers and debate, Members commented on:

·       One Member informed the Committee that Bourne Town Council had no objections.

·       It was queried as to why previous plans had not been started and why revised plans were different to what was being proposed. It seemed that amenity land had been lost visually.

The tree had been removed via the outline planning application historically.

The Planning Officer concluded that the open space had been retained and would not impact on the amenity and character of the area.

The Assistant Director of Planning clarified that the original application dates from the mid 1980’s and it was typical of developments of that era to have areas of informal space, open spaces and grass verges.

It was common that developers may convey any informal spaces to the residents rather than being transferred to either the District Council or Authority.

·       Whether there was an issues on erecting fences over 1.8 metres and if this proposal would set a precedent for the area. 

Every case was judged on its own merits, however, this application was to retain an element of informal open space character to the street scene.

·       It was queried whether the verge element of the proposal belonged to the Applicant.

Highways did own a section of the proposed land, however the Applicant owned the majority of the land outlined.

It was proposed, seconded and AGREED to authorise the Assistant Director – Planning to GRANT planning permission, subject to conditions.

Conditions

Time Limits

The development hereby permitted, including the re-alignment of the fence, shall be completed before the expiration of 3 months from the date of this permission.

Reason: In order that the development is completed in a timely manner and in accordance with the approved plans.

Approved Plans

1) The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following list of approved plans:

i. Location Plan re. 532-P-01A received 10 January 2024

Unless otherwise required by another condition of this permission.

Reason: To define the permission and for the avoidance of doubt.

One Member raised specific Planning concerns in relaton to North Street and Haddon Road in Stamford.

The Chairman closed the meeting at 11:05.