Agenda and minutes

Venue: Council Chamber - South Kesteven House, St. Peter's Hill, Grantham. NG31 6PZ. View directions

Contact: Democratic Services 

Media

Items
No. Item

83.

Apologies for absence

  • Share this item

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Apologies for absence were received from Councillors:

 

Emma Baker

Phil Gadd

Ben Green

Zoe Lane

Nikki Manterfield

Nick Robins

Penny Robins

Jane Wood

Sue Woolley

 

Councillor Matt Bailey would join the meeting after the start of proceedings.

84.

Disclosure of Interests

  • Share this item

Members are asked to disclose any interests in matters for consideration at the meeting.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

No interests were disclosed.

85.

Interim Local Government Reorganisation Proposal for South Kesteven pdf icon PDF 232 KB

  • Share this item

To present the interim proposal for Local Government Reorganisation in South Kesteven to Full Council.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Members considered the interim Local Government Reorganisation (LGR) Proposal for South Kesteven.

 

Following a vote, Council Procedure Rule 11.5 was suspended to allow the Leader of the Council more time to introduce the item.

 

The following points were highlighted during the presentation:

 

  • The first letter on the subject of LGR from Government was received by the Council on 16 December 2024, followed by a second letter on 5 February 2025. The subject was initially discussed at Full Council on 27 February 2025.
  • The deadline for interim LGR proposals was 21 March 2025, with a final deadline for proposals of 28 November 2025. There were no definitive dates yet on when a shadow authority and first meeting of any new organisation would be held, but it was assumed this would take place in 2027, with a first meeting in 2028.
  • Additional internal consultation took place with members through two separate member briefings held on 10 March, and discussions at Cabinet. Three staff briefings would take place in the coming weeks.
  • External consultation took place with Baroness Taylor, Lincolnshire District Leaders and Chief Executives, Greater Lincolnshire Leaders and Chief Executives, the District Councils Network, local MPs, and neighbouring local councils.
  • The core criteria for LGR set by Government included a target population threshold of 500,000, cohesive geography, and a sustainable long-term system settlement to withstand financial shocks with preferably no boundary changes. Whilst the Council may not be in support of devolution, their proposal must support devolution.
  • The population threshold of 500,000 was a flexible target – submissions that included a lower number would be considered.
  • Several models of reorganisation had been rejected. These included a model based on a ‘Greater Lincoln’ (population level too low), models involving geographic incoherence (such as a coastal ribbon running from the River Humber down to South Kesteven), a merger with Peterborough City area, models involving splitting other counties (such as the inclusion of Melton or Newark) and most models requiring boundary changes (with the exception of Rutland County Council).
  • Alternatives included the option favoured by Lincolnshire County Council (LCC). This would keep the LCC boundaries in tact and North and North East Lincolnshire Councils would merge. Another option would be an east/west split in terms of geography, with North and North East Lincolnshire remaining in place in the north of the county. The final alternative was a ‘north/south’ unitary model.
  • Optimal solution is ‘Unitary 1’ which included South Holland District Council (SHDC), Rutland County Council (RCC) and both North and South Kesteven District Councils. The solution had other advantages such as reasonable travel time around the district, and a uniform demographic. Unitary 1 included market towns with rural hinterland. The proposal did not include a city, but did include Lincolnshire’s largest town, Grantham, which was on a mainline railway.
  • Population numbers for the proposal ‘Unitary 1’ were roughly 400,000.
  • There was not scheduled to be any feedback on the submitted proposal from Government until November, although there may be further advice in the intervening period.  ...  view the full minutes text for item 85.

86.

Close of meeting

  • Share this item

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The meeting closed at 4:30pm.