Agenda and minutes

Venue: Council Chamber - South Kesteven House, St. Peter's Hill, Grantham. NG31 6PZ. View directions

Contact: Email: Democracy@southkesteven.gov.uk 

Media

Items
No. Item

89.

Apologies for absence

  • Share this item

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Apologies for absence were received from Councillors Rob Shorrock and Paul Wood. It was noted that Councillor Mark Whittington was attending as a substitute for this meeting only in place of Councillor Paul Wood.

 

Councillors Ashley Baxter and Richard Cleaver also presented their apologies for absence to the meeting.

90.

Disclosure of interests

  • Share this item

Members are asked to disclose any interests in matters for consideration at the meeting.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

No interests were disclosed.

91.

LeisureSK Limited - Board of Directors pdf icon PDF 182 KB

  • Share this item

To consider making appointments to the Board of Directors for LeisureSK Ltd.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Cabinet Member for Leisure and Culture presented a report which recommended the appointment of Councillor Patsy Ellis (Cabinet Member for Environment and Waste), Councillor Philip Knowles (Cabinet Member for Corporate Governance and Licensing) and Mr Paul Sutton (Interim Deputy Section 151 Officer) onto the Board of Leisure SK Limited. The rationale for the appointments was based upon the challenges currently facing the company and the under-representation on the Board which only consisted of two individuals, thereby meeting the minimum requirements for a quorum. The Cabinet Member was of the view that further representation was required on the Board with the right skill sets to support the existing membership of the Board and help move the company forward.

 

The Monitoring Officer provided clarification regarding the legal comments outlined in the report, whereby external legal advice had strongly recommended that Cabinet Members and Statutory Officers should not be appointed onto the Boards of wholly-owned Council companies without sufficient justification for doing so. Those recommended for appointment to the Board were two Cabinet Members and a Deputy Statutory Officer. The Monitoring Officer reported that, in consultation with the Leader of the Council, they both believed the current circumstances facing the company, particularly given the fact that the Governance and Audit Committee had been unable to appoint onto the Board of LeisureSK Limited at its previous meeting, meant that there was sufficient justification for appointing Cabinet Members and a Deputy Statutory Officer onto the Board.

 

Questions were raised as to why further information relating to the two Cabinet Members had not been provided in the report in relation to their respective backgrounds and what competencies, experience and skills they could bring to the Board of LeisureSK Limited. It was noted that they had been nominated by the Leader of the Council who, as set out in the report, had outlined that they were both Cabinet Members who had experience of managing finances within a corporate environment.

 

Concerns were expressed in relation to the legal advice that Cabinet Members should not be appointed onto the Boards of Council-owned companies. Furthermore, a question was raised as to any conflict associated with the Cabinet Member for Corporate Governance and Licensing and his relationship with the Governance and Audit Committee. The Monitoring Officer provided clarification that the role of the Governance and Audit Committee was solely the appointment of Directors to the Board. Scrutiny of LeisureSK Limited as a company would fall under the responsibility of the Culture and Leisure Overview and Scrutiny Committee. It was noted that conflicts of interest may occur as a result of being on the Board of LeisureSK Limited as well as being a Cabinet Member or Deputy Statutory Officer, but reassurances were provided that such conflicts could be managed.

 

Further discussion ensued on the rationale and need for the three nominees to be appointed, not from a personal perspective regarding the individuals concerned but in relation to why such appointments were necessary at this time. The Cabinet Member highlighted that in  ...  view the full minutes text for item 91.