Agenda and minutes
PDF 157 KBVenue: Council Chamber - Council Offices, St. Peter's Hill, Grantham. NG31 6PZ
Contact: Email: Democracy@southkesteven.gov.uk
Media
| No. | Item |
|---|---|
|
Register of attendance and apologies for absence
Additional documents: Minutes: An apology for absence was received from Councillor Ian Stokes.
Councillor Phil Dilks filled the Alliance SK vacancy. |
|
|
Disclosure of interests
Members are asked to disclose any interests in matters for consideration at the meeting. Additional documents: Minutes: Councillor Mary Whittington declared an interest on application S22/1998.
Councillor Penny Robins declared an interest on application S22/2375. |
|
|
Minutes of the meeting held on 30 March 2023
Additional documents: Minutes: The minutes of the meeting held on 30 March 2023 were proposed, seconded and AGREED as a correct record. |
|
Proposal: Demolition of the existing petrol filling station and construction of a new retail foodstore (Class E), car parking, cycle parking, landscaping and associated works
Location: Land To East Of The Deepings Shopping Centre Godsey Lane, Market Deeping, PE6 8HT Recommendation: To authorise the Assistant Director – Planning to GRANT planning permission, subject to conditions and the completion of a Section 106 Agreement.
Additional documents: Minutes: Proposal:Demolition of the existing petrol filling station and construction of a new retail foodstore (Class E), car parking, cycle parking, landscaping and associated works Location: Land To East Of The Deepings Shopping Centre, Godsey Lane, Market Deeping, PE6 8HT Recommendation: To authorise the Assistant Director – Planning to GRANT planning permission, subject to conditions and the completion of a Section 106 Agreement.
Noting comments made in the public speaking session by:
District Ward Councillors: Councillor Virginia Moran Councillor Ashley Baxter Against: James Hudson (Statement) Applicant’s agent: Christina Weguelin (Newriver and Deeping Centre)
Together with:
· Provisions within the South Kesteven Plan 2011-2036, Deepings Neighbourhood Plan, Design Guidelines for Rutland and South Kesteven Supplementary Planning Document, National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF). · Comments received from Market Deeping Town Council. · Comments received from The Deepings Parish Council. · Comments received from LCC Highways/LLFA. · Comments received from Environmental Protection Officer. · Comments received from Lincolnshire Fire and Rescue Fire Safety Officer. · Comments received from Drainage Board. · No comments received from Anglian Water. · Comments received from Heritage Lincolnshire. · Comments received from Cllr Adam Brookes. · Comments received from Rapleys.
During questions to Public Speakers, Members commented on:
· Whether there was currently a retail food store currently in Deeping St James. It was confirmed that the nearest retail stores were in Market Deeping. · Whether long stay parking could be reviewed and the maximum stay time be increased on the site.
The Applicant confirmed that the parking regime would be revised and long-term car parking within their ownership would be explored, if the application be approved.
· One Member queried the height and materials of the acoustic fence.
The acoustic fence would be made from wood and approximately 3 meters high, it would be placed along the boundary around the service yard. The density of the fence would keep noise levels to a minimum.
· Whether any of the proposed 128 spaces would be lost due to the development and if the application would be open to increasing the short-term parking from 3 to 4 hours in order for visitors to access other stores within the Shopping Centre.
The Applicant stated that the development would allow an increase of car parking spaces by about 7 spaces and would accept an increase of short-term parking from 3 to 4 hours.
· It was queried as to how many deliveries would be delivered to the site in one day.
The Planning Officer stated that the noise impact assessment noted that there would not be more than 3-4 deliveries per day and there would be no crossovers of deliveries offloading at the same time. The proposed delivery time was proposed between 7:00 and 22:00hrs.
· It was noted that the loading bays may have high noise levels from moving objects from the loading plate onto the rear of the vehicles. One Member queried what mitigation would be put into place to prevent these noise levels from being a noise nuisance for the neighbours.
The Applicant outlined a condition that had a requirement to provide ... view the full minutes text for item 91. |
|
Proposal: Erection of 3(no.) detached 1 ½ storey dwellings, following the demolition of the existing property.
Location: The Rookery, The Green, Allington
Recommendation: To authorise the Assistant Director – Planning to GRANT planning permission, subject to conditions. Additional documents: Minutes: Proposal: Erection of 3(no.) detached 1 ½ storey dwellings, following the demolition of the existing property. Location: The Rookery, The Green, Allington Recommendation: To authorise the Assistant Director – Planning to GRANT planning permission, subject to conditions.
Noting comments made in the public speaking session by:
Allington Parish Council: Antony Scott Against: Eluned Read Applicant’s agent: Jonathan Wall (Architect at Vale Planning Consultants)
Together with:
· Provisions within South Kesteven Local Plan 2011-2036, Design Guidelines for Rutland and South Kesteven Supplement Planning Document, National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF). · Comments received from Allington Parish Council. · Comments received from Cadent Gas. · Comments received from Heritage Lincolnshire. · No comments received from Historic England. · Comments received from Lincolnshire County Council (Highways and SuDS). · Comments received from SKDC Conservation Consultee.
During questions to Public Speakers, Members commented on:
· It was noted that the three proposed properties were 1 ½ storey bungalows. The properties surrounding the proposed properties were all bungalows. It was queried as to whether the Parish Council would object to the proposal if the properties proposed were bungalows.
The Allington Parish Council representative highlighted that the Parish Council would not object to an appropriate development on the site. The concerns raised were regarding the requirement of single-storey bungalows and decreasing the number of properties to two.
· It was queried as to whether the Applicant would consider excavating the ground of the site to level the ground which would lower the footprint of the property.
The Applicant’s agent confirmed that the recommendation did not include a proposal to lower the site level substantially, but some leveling of the site would take place, if the application was approved.
· Concern was raised over the height of the proposed dwellings and the existing bungalows within vicinity of the site. · It was queried as to whether the Applicant had consulted with the Parish Council and the population of Allington.
The Applicant’s agent confirmed that the proposed design of the dwellings were a metre taller than the existing properties surrounding the site in terms of the ridges. The Parish Council were consulted during the application process.
During questions to Officers and debate, Members commented on:
· Whether any measurements had been taken from the Greystones bungalow, which seemed closer in distance on the site visit to the proposed dwellings.
It was confirmed that the boundary of the site was 10 ½ metres away. The approximate separation distance from the site to the Greystones bungalow was anticipated to be 28 ½ metres away.
· It was suggested that the term ‘dormer’ bungalows be changed to chalet bungalows to reflect roof lights for the 1 ½ storey plot.
The Planning Officer agreed that the bungalows should be described as chalet bungalows within the report. The planning application stated that the proposal was for 1 ½ storey dwellings.
It was queried as to whether the roof windows could be converted into dormer windows and if this could be conditioned.
The permitted development rights on the application could be removed, if the Committee felt ... view the full minutes text for item 92. |
|
|
Application S22/2375
Proposal: Erection of outbuilding to be used as annex to rear of property Location: Linden House, Main Street, Bulby
Recommendation: To authorise the Assistant Director – Planning to GRANT planning permission, subject to conditions Additional documents: Minutes: Proposal: Erection of outbuilding to be used as annex to rear of property Location: Linden House, Main Street, Bulby Recommendation: To authorise the Assistant Director – Planning to GRANT planning permission, subject to conditions
Noting comments made in the public speaking session by:
District Ward Councillor: Councillor Nick Robins Irnham Parish Council: Jenny Crow Against: John Slater Applicant: Andrew Etherington
Together with:
· Provisions within SKDC Local Plan 2011-2036 and National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF). · Comments received from Ward Councillor. · Comments received from LCC Highways and SuDS Support. · Comments received from Environmental Protection Services (SKDC).
During questions to Public Speakers, Members commented on:
· It was queried as to whether the current property had been used as an Airbnb on a regular basis previously.
The speaker speaking in objection to the application confirmed that Linden House was regularly used as an Airbnb on a regular basis. The speaker believed that this application would provide further accommodation for Airbnb use.
· One Member questioned as to how the Applicant would overcome the issue with sewerage.
The Applicant confirmed that a macerator was installed when Linden House was built and there was an over capacity which would have the capacity for the proposed annex.
· How the Applicant intended on managing the construction access and whether those affected would be consulted surrounding the site. · Whether there would be any extra vehicles at the dwelling, if the application be approved. · It was queried as to why the plan included a metre-wide door on the south elevation.
The Applicant confirmed that the metre-wide door was to enable wheelchair access. The construction access would be via the track at the side of Linden House and over the existing beech hedge or would be dropped off on the driveway of Linden House. There would be no extra vehicles at the dwelling, if the application was approved.
· Whether all sewerage, water and electricity would be ancillary to Linden House.
The sewerage, water and electric would be taken directly and metered back to the Linden House supply.
During questions to Officers and debate, Members commented on:
· Concern was raised on the representations received from the public in relation to trees being felled to accommodate the proposal. It was queried as to what trees would be felled and whether it was a significant loss.
The Planning Officer noted that some tree trimming would be required, however, there wouldn’t be any trees removed or maintenance required.
One member expressed their concern on the Airbnb aspect of the existing dwelling. The report stated that the Airbnb was not considered to constitute a material change of use under current planning legislation.
It was suggested that a condition be implemented to ensure the proposed annex was not used for Airbnb purposes.
The Planning Officer confirmed that the revised wording of condition 8 within the presentation outlined the controlled the use of the annex and ensured the annex could not be rented out independently.
In planning terms, it was entirely lawful and feasible for a property owner to ... view the full minutes text for item 93. |
|
|
Application S22/1630
Proposal: Creation of a Multi Use Games Area, with perimeter fencing, floodlighting and asphalt access pathway
Location: Stamford School, Conduit Road, Stamford
Recommendation: To authorise the Assistant Director – Planning to GRANT planning permission, subject to conditions.
Additional documents: Minutes: Proposal: Creation of a Multi Use Games Area, with perimeter fencing, floodlighting and asphalt access pathway Location: Stamford School, Conduit Road, Stamford Recommendation: To authorise the Assistant Director – Planning to GRANT planning permission, subject to conditions
Noting comments made in the public speak session by:
Against: Geoff Woodcock Applicant: Stewart Dorey (Director of Estates and Facilities, Stamford Endowed Schools)
Together with:
· Provisions within SKDC Local Plan 2011-2036, Stamford Neighbourhood Plan, National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF). · Comments received from Stamford Town Council. · Comments received from LCC Highways & SuDS Support. · Comments received from Environmental Protection. · Comments received from Heritage Lincolnshire. · Comments received from Sport England. · Comments received from Stamford Tennis Club.
During questions to Public Speakers, Members commented on:
· Whether people accessing Stamford School for the games area could have a designated parking area elsewhere. The applicant had explored closing other car parks for staff only, however, it may exasperate issues on Conduit Road. · The number of car parking spaces allocated was queried.
The applicant noted that engagement with the community was for affiliated clubs and were not available for one-off lets.
· Whether the applicant would be willing to accept a condition on car parking away from the site. · Whether an allocated ‘pick-up’ and ‘drop-off’ zone could be implemented for parents collecting children. The applicant confirmed that certain measures were already in place, however, enforcement along Conduit Road was not the responsibility of the schools.
The Planning Officer raised concern regarding the enforceability of a parking condition that had been suggested. The Community Use Agreement was conditioned, which effectively set out that the school acknowledged their wider asset portfolio and they would look to manage the parking appropriately.
· Whether the application would add to the traffic and parking problems on Conduit Road.
The Applicant noted that the majority of community use would be used at the weekend or during school holidays, where most of the traffic in Stamford was significantly reduced.
· One Member requested the Applicant to highlight what the main benefits for the children would be, if the application was approved.
The Applicant confirmed that this application would create netball classroom spaces for the school pupils, the predominant use would be during school hours and would also provide facilities for young people to enjoy who did not attend the school.
During questions to Officers and debate, Members commented on:
· Whether Highways had watched the video footage that had been showed by the member of the public speaking against the application. It was requested that the application be deferred until Highways watch the video.
It was proposed, seconded and AGREED to authorise the Assistant Director – Planning to GRANT planning permission subject to conditions.
Time Limit for Commencement
1 The development hereby permitted shall be commenced before the expiration of three years from the date of this permission.
Reason: In order that the development is commenced in a timely manner, as set out in Section 91 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended).
Approved Plans
2 The development ... view the full minutes text for item 94. |
|
|
Application S22/2185
Proposal: Demolition of existing single storey extension and construction of new rear, single storey and two storey extension; and erection of garden office
Location: 61 Conduit Road, Stamford, Lincolnshire PE9 1QL
Recommendation: To authorise the Assistant Director to GRANT planning permission, subject to conditions
Additional documents: Minutes: Proposal: Demolition of existing single storey extension and construction of new rear, single storey and two storey extension; and erection of garden office Location: 61 Conduit Road, Stamford, Lincolnshire PE9 1QL Recommendation: To authorise the Assistant Director to GRANT planning permission, subject to conditions
Noting comments made in the public speaking session by:
District Ward Councillor: Councillor Amanda Wheeler (Statement) Against: Helen Donnellan
Together with:
· Provisions within SKDC Local Plan 2011-2036 and National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF). · Comments received from Lincolnshire County Council Highways. · Comments received from Stamford Town Council. · No comments received from Stamford Civic Society.
During questions to Public Speakers, Members commented on:
· Clarification was sought from the public speaker regarding the photo provided of the view from her kitchen window. The neighbour speaking against the application noted that her building was extended prior to her moving in.
During questions to Officers and debate, Members commented on:
· Members requested to view the diagram of the 25-degree angle which was provided in the design and access statement.
It was confirmed that the eyeline point from the neighbor’s kitchen window was at 17 degrees and therefore within South Kesteven Design Guidelines standards.
· Concern was raised on the possible overbearing of other properties within the site.
The Assistant Director of Planning noted that this would be a matter of judgement and the property to the south had been substantially extended which had an impact on the proposed site.
Properties adjacent to 61 Conduit Road had received alterations and extensions over previous years. The application had to be assessed on it’s own merits and the impacts on neighbors.
· Further concern was raised over the blocking of sunlight.
The Planning Officer highlighted that any new structure would cause affects to the loss of light. It was felt that this application would not see an unacceptable loss of light level as per the Council’s design guidance.
It was proposed, seconded and AGREED to authorise the Assistant Director – Planning to GRANT planning permission subject to conditions.
Time Limit for Commencement
1) The development hereby permitted shall be commenced before the expiration of three years from the date of this permission.
Reason: In order that the development is commenced in a timely manner, as set out in Section 91 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended).
Approved Plans
2) The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following list of approved plans:
i. Proposed Elevations - dwg no. A301/A - received 23/01/23 ii. Site Plans - dwg no. A100/A - received 23/01/23 iii. Proposed Floor Plans - dwg no. A102/D - received 23/01/23Unless otherwise required by another condition of this permission.
Reason: To define the permission and for the avoidance of doubt.
Before the Development is Occupied
3) Before any part of the development hereby permitted is occupied/brought into use, the external elevations shall have been completed using only the materials stated in the planning application forms and approved drawings unless otherwise agreed in writing by ... view the full minutes text for item 95. |
|
|
Application S22/2313
Proposal: Removal of the existing front lounge window and replacement with 1(no) residential door and side panel; erection of concrete ramp with handrails
Location: 7 Treadgold Avenue, Great Gonerby, NG31 8PD
Recommendation: To authorise the Assistant Director – Planning to GRANT planning permission, subject to conditions.
Additional documents: Minutes: Proposal: Removal of the existing front lounge window and replacement with 1(no) residential door and side panel; erection of concrete ramp with handrails Location: 7 Treadgold Avenue, Great Gonerby, NG31 8PD Recommendation: To authorise the Assistant Director to GRANT planning permission, subject to conditions
Together with:
· Provisions within SKDC Local Plan 2011-2036 and National Planning Policy Framework. · Comments made from Lincolnshire County Council Highways.
It was proposed, seconded and AGREED to authorise the Assistant Director of Planning to GRANT planning permission subject to the following conditions:
Time Limit for Commencement
1) The development hereby permitted shall be commenced before the expiration of three years from the date of this permission.
Reason: In order that the development is commenced in a timely manner, as set out in Section 91 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended).
Approved Plans
2) The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following list of approved plans:
i. Location Plan - received 24/11/22
ii. Existing & Proposed Elevation & Floor Plan - dwg no. DFG 7 TREADGOLD AVENUE - received 01/12/22
Unless otherwise required by another condition of this permission.
Reason: To define the permission and for the avoidance of doubt.
Before the Development is Occupied
3) Before any part of the development hereby permitted is occupied/brought into use, the external elevations shall have been completed using only the materials stated in the planning application forms and approved drawings unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority.
Reason: To ensure a satisfactory appearance to the development and in accordance with Policy DE1 of the adopted South Kesteven Local Plan.
(Councillor Julia Reid left the meeting at 17:30) |
|
|
Any other business, which the Chairman, by reason of special circumstances, decides is urgent
Additional documents: Minutes: There were none. |
|
|
Close of meeting
Additional documents: Minutes: The Chairman closed the meeting at 17:35. |