Agenda and minutes

Venue: Witham Room, Council Offices, St. Peter's Hill, Grantham

Contact: Paul Morrison 01476 406512 Email: p.morrison@southkesteven.gov.uk  Jo Toomey 01476 406152 Email: j.toomey@southkesteven.gov.uk

Items
No. Item

130.

MEMBERSHIP

  • Share this item

The Panel to be notified of any substitute members.

Minutes:

 

The Panel were notified that Councillor Craft would be substituting for Councillor G. Taylor for this meeting only.

131.

APOLOGIES

  • Share this item

Minutes:

 

Apologies for absence were received from Councillors Conboy, Joynson and Lovelock.

132.

DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

  • Share this item

Members are asked to declare any interests in matters for consideration at the meeting.

Minutes:

 

None declared.

133.

ACTION NOTES

  • Share this item

The notes of the meeting held on 18th January 2007 are attached for information.

(Attached)

Minutes:

 

Noted.

134.

FEEDBACK FROM THE EXECUTIVE

  • Share this item

Minutes:

 

  • The Resources and Assets Portfolio Holder had been appointed as the lead member on partnership working.
  • Gershon targets which were not met would be rolled over to the next financial year. Achievement of targets was likely to be auditable.
  • Work with the LSP on dial-a-ride had begun. A review of its effectiveness, efficiency and delivery of service would be carried out.
  • A joint meeting of the Economic, Healthy Environment and Resources DSP was required to discuss the draft Grantham Masterplan. CDs containing the Masterplan had been circulated. Rough costings were required for each project.

 

ACTION POINT:

 

A joint meeting between the Economic, Healthy Environment and Resources DSPs should be called during the last two weeks in March.

 

RECOMMENDATION:

 

The Chief Executive should ensure that the Section 151 Officer is provided with rough costings for all projects detailed in the draft Grantham Masterplan prior to this meeting.

135.

UPDATES FROM PREVIOUS MEETING

  • Share this item

Minutes:

 

It was hoped that a new format for DSP action notes would ensure all recommendations were actioned. Future action notes would identify the officer responsible for completing a task.

The Chairman accepted the following item as urgent business to allow pre-decision scrutiny of the proposed budget for 2007/8 before the Cabinet decision on 12th January 2007.

136.

BUDGET 2007/8

  • Share this item

Minutes:

 

The Panel scrutinised report CHFR29, which contained proposals for the 2007/8 budget.

 

  • Budget management would be devolved to Service Managers. Virements would be controlled on a corporate level by Financial Services and adhere to financial regulations.
  • A report would be submitted to Cabinet on 5th March 2007 on settling the pension capital costs in advance of the triennial review due in April 2007. Costs could be settled on a year-by-year basis or split over three years. The council would be charged interest if payment was split over three years.

 

ACTION POINT:

 

The Resources DSP will scrutinise the report on settling the pension capital costs at their meeting on 15th March 2007.

 

  • A new nationally negotiated pension scheme would be introduced from 2008. There would be limited local flexibilities.

 

ACTION POINT:

 

At the first meeting of the newly appointed Resources DSP following the 2007 District Council elections, a presentation should be given on the new local government pension scheme.

 

  • A 2% salary efficiency was required. Service managers would be presented with the reduced figure. Efficiencies would be monitored on a corporate level because of variation in staff turnover between sections.

 

ACTION POINT:

 

A numerical breakdown of staff efficiencies should be supplied for consideration at the Cabinet meeting on 12th March 2007.

 

  • Managers would be encouraged to project when spending would take place. Profiled budgets would facilitate reviewing capital programme delivery.
  • Salary inflation for 2007/8 had been estimated at 2.5%, in line with guidance. Additional posts and increases in grade had been incorporated in service planning.
  • A one-off bid for funding had been made for “Communications Priorities”. This was for Gateway signs to the district and media training.

 

CONCLUSION:

 

Panel members expressed their concern to Cabinet on the bid for one-off budget provision for “Communications Priorities”, and that this bid should be removed.

 

  • A report was to be prepared on Special Expense Areas to assess whether the net expenditure was fully recovered.

 

ACTION POINT:

 

At the first meeting of the newly appointed Resources DSP following the 2007 District Council elections, the report on Special Expense Areas should undergo pre-decision scrutiny.

 

  • The Community DSP had requested information on the Building Control Reserve. Scrutiny of this could be referred to the Resources DSP.
  • There were concerns that any Local Area Agreement could require the aligning of funds between all councils in Lincolnshire. The District Council would need to look into rationalising funding streams.
  • Grant funding of £10,000 for 2006/7 and £52,000 for 2007/8 had been received for the implementation of smoke-free legislation.
  • Local Forums had been consulted on proposed increases in council tax. Of the five that had taken place, three were in favour of an increase of 4.9%, one was in favour of an increase of 2.5% and the final one was closely balanced.
  • No formal guidance on capping had been received. Informal guidance stated that there was no power for the government to cap district councils on the basis of parish councils.  ...  view the full minutes text for item 136.

137.

USE OF LEISURE CENTRES BY SCHOOLS

  • Share this item

The Panel will receive information on Lincolnshire County Council’s contribution to district councils for schools’ usage of leisure centres.

Minutes:

 

A briefing note was circulated at the meeting.

 

  • The District Council had Chance to Share Agreements in respect of the leisure centres in Bourne and the Deepings. The agreements provided a basis for the allocation of costs between users of the facilities.

 

Deepings Leisure Centre

 

  • The County Council were recharged on a quarterly basis. The charge was agreed historically and index linked.
  • For 2006/7 the County Council were recharged £146,500; historically recharges had not exceeded £150,000. Increasing utility costs could mean that recharges would increase at a rate greater than inflation.
  • The County Council wanted to “cap” their contribution to approximately £130,000.
  • The Deepings School are recharged for their use of the leisure centre. They were not seeking to change the arrangement.

 

Bourne

 

  • A Chance to Share Agreement was established with the County Council in 1991. This arrangement passed to Bourne Robert Manning Technology College when the Lincolnshire County Council Budget was delegated to schools.

 

ACTION POINT:

 

Officers should continue to work with the County Council and provide an update for the new Resources DSP in June 2007.

138.

IMPLEMENTATION OF RECOMMENDATIONS MADE DURING INTERNAL AUDIT

  • Share this item

The Panel will receive an update from the Service Manager, Business Transformation and Information Management on the implementation of recommendations made by PricewaterhouseCoopers.                                                                                                            (Attached)

Minutes:

 

At their meeting on 18th January 2007, the Resources DSP expressed concerns that not all recommendations made by internal audit had been implemented.

 

  • Internal Audit had recommended that testing of the TeamSpirit Payroll system should be done in isolation of the production system in a dedicated test environment to reduce risk to system integrity and availability issues.
  • The Service Manager, Business Transformation and Information Management explained why the recommendation was not accepted. He was satisfied that there were sufficient safeguards to protect the live system.

 

Members accepted the officer’s explanation.

139.

RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGY AND RISK ACTION PLAN

  • Share this item

The Panel will scrutinise the amended Risk Management Strategy and appended Risk Action Plan

Minutes:

 

  • The District Council’s Risk Management Strategy was first approved in September 2004.
  • Changes had been made to the original document:
    • The definition of risk had been expanded.
    • A diagram demonstrating the risk environment had been added, which showed that risk did not exist in isolation.
    • The methodology for assessing and categorising risk had been simplified. The new matrix aligned with other local authorities across Lincolnshire.
    • It was proposed that a risk management group should be set up.
    • Regular risk management reports were proposed. An annual risk management report would be produced. This would assess how effectively processes had been embedded.
  • The Risk Management Strategy covered every member of staff and elected member. A training programme for staff and members was being developed.
  • Risks identified in service plans would be collated and monitored.
  • An equalities impact assessment was required for the Risk Management Strategy.

 

ACTION POINT:

 

Risk Management reports should become a standing item on the agenda for the Resources DSP.

 

RECOMMENDATION:

 

1.                  The Resources DSP recommended that a local performance indicator should be developed to show the number of items at each level of risk: red, amber and green.

2.                  The Resources DSP recommended to the Assets and Resources Portfolio Holder, the adoption of the amended Risk Management Strategy.

140.

REVIEW OF DELIVERY OF THE CAPITAL PROGRAMME

  • Share this item

Report CHFR32 and appendix on the delivery of the Capital Programme.       (Attached)

Minutes:

  • The focus of report CHFR32 was the delivery of the capital programme for 2006/7.
  • Following a decision by Cabinet on 5th February 2007, the grant for Aire Road had been removed. Work was being done on a new scheme.
  • Grants for the Stamford Gateway project and the Northfields site in Market Deeping had rolled over to 2007/8.
  • £1.7 million was due to be spent on Welham Street car park by the end of March, 2007. Large invoices for steel and concrete were expected before then.
  • The next meeting of the Capital Asset Management Group on March 9th 2007 would review proposals for charging machinery. Machinery would need to be procured by the beginning of April.

 

ACTION POINT:

 

1.                  The joint Resources DSP and Economic DSP car parking working group should meet as soon as possible after the Capital Asset Management Group to discuss proposals for charging machinery.

2.                  The findings of the working group should be circulated to all members of the Resources DSP.

 

·        Assets and facilities showed a significant underspend. Costs of security works and asbestos removal works were not show because they had not been coded. There would be approximately £250,000 that would not be spent. This had been allocated as grant funding to Grantham hospital but had not been needed.

141.

GATEWAY REVIEW FEEDBACK SESSION

  • Share this item

The Panel will consider the gateway process for 2007/08 and make recommendations for 2008/09.                                                                                                            (Attached)

Minutes:

 

  • Members of the DSP considered how successful the Gateway Review process had been.
  • Arrangements had worked well within the Resources DSP and other DSPs were generally pleased.
  • Gateways 1 and 2 were considered very useful because more members of the Council could be involved in developing the budget by concentrating on service plans and/or financial information.
  • The format of Gateway 3 was questioned. It was suggested that this should be signing-off work following Gateways 1 and 2 and should be done by the Resources DSP.
  • Some of the first gateway reviews lacked focus; a check list was prepared for the second and third gateway reviews, which made members’ roles more clear.
  • Category M services should be provided with a baseline total which they must not exceed to save officer and member time removing growth bids.
  • A report on the Gateway reviews was to be produced by the Corporate Head, Finance and Resources and the relevant strategic director.
  • Service managers needed to work more closely with Portfolio Holders.
  • The Scrutiny Officer was consulting with other Lincolnshire authorities on their scrutiny of the budget process. The findings would be presented to the Scrutiny Co-ordinating Group

 

CONCLUSIONS

 

The Resources DSP recommends that:

 

1.                  The Cabinet should provide Service Managers with an indication of likely resources for budget preparation purposes;

2.                  Gateways 1 and 2 should be completed in the same format as those during 2006/7;

3.                  The third Gateway Review should consist of the Resources DSP and one member from each other DSPs, signing off the work that had been done.

142.

BEST VALUE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

  • Share this item

(Attached)

Minutes:

 

Noted.

143.

WORK PROGRAMME

  • Share this item

(Attached)

Minutes:

 

Noted.

 

ACTION POINTS:

 

  • The financial impact of LSVT should be removed from the work programme.
  • The car parking charges working group should be added to the work programme.

144.

CLOSE OF MEETING

  • Share this item

Minutes:

 

The meeting was closed at 12:37