The Panel to be notified of any substitute
members.
Minutes:
The Panel were notified that Councillor
Craft would be substituting for Councillor G. Taylor for this
meeting only.
131.
APOLOGIES
Share this item
Minutes:
Apologies for absence were received from
Councillors Conboy, Joynson and Lovelock.
132.
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
Share this item
Members are asked
to declare any interests in matters for consideration at the
meeting.
Minutes:
None declared.
133.
ACTION NOTES
Share this item
The notes of the meeting held on
18th January 2007 are attached for
information.
(Attached)
Minutes:
Noted.
134.
FEEDBACK FROM THE EXECUTIVE
Share this item
Minutes:
The Resources and Assets Portfolio Holder
had been appointed as the lead member on partnership
working.
Gershontargets which were not met would be rolled over to the next
financial year. Achievement of targets was likely to be
auditable.
Work with the LSP on dial-a-ride had begun. A review of its
effectiveness, efficiency and delivery of service would be carried
out.
A joint meeting of the Economic, Healthy
Environment and Resources DSP was
required to discuss the draft Grantham Masterplan. CDs containing the Masterplan had been circulated. Rough costings were required for each
project.
ACTION
POINT:
A joint meeting
between the Economic, Healthy Environment and Resources
DSPs should be called during the last
two weeks in March.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Chief Executive
should ensure that the Section 151 Officer is provided with rough
costings for all projects detailed in
the draft Grantham Masterplan prior to
this meeting.
135.
UPDATES FROM PREVIOUS MEETING
Share this item
Minutes:
It was hoped that a new format for
DSP action notes would ensure all
recommendations were actioned. Future
action notes would identify the officer responsible for completing
a task.
The Chairman accepted the following item as
urgent business to allow pre-decision scrutiny of the proposed
budget for 2007/8 before the Cabinet decision on 12th
January 2007.
136.
BUDGET 2007/8
Share this item
Minutes:
The Panel scrutinised report CHFR29,
which contained proposals for the 2007/8 budget.
Budget management would be devolved to
Service Managers. Virements would be
controlled on a corporate level by Financial Services and adhere to
financial regulations.
A report would be submitted to Cabinet on
5th March 2007 on settling the pension capital costs in
advance of the triennial review due in April 2007. Costs could be
settled on a year-by-year basis or split over three years. The
council would be charged interest if payment was split over three
years.
ACTION
POINT:
The Resources
DSP will scrutinise the report on
settling the pension capital costs at their meeting on
15th March 2007.
A new nationally negotiated pension
scheme would be introduced from 2008. There would be limited local
flexibilities.
ACTION
POINT:
At the first meeting
of the newly appointed Resources DSP
following the 2007 District Council elections, a presentation
should be given on the new local government pension scheme.
A 2% salary efficiency was required.
Service managers would be presented with the reduced figure.
Efficiencies would be monitored on a corporate level because of
variation in staff turnover between sections.
ACTION
POINT:
A numerical breakdown
of staff efficiencies should be supplied for consideration at the
Cabinet meeting on 12th March 2007.
Managers would be encouraged to project
when spending would take place. Profiled budgets would facilitate
reviewing capital programme delivery.
Salary inflation for 2007/8 had been
estimated at 2.5%, in line with guidance. Additional posts and
increases in grade had been incorporated in service
planning.
A one-off bid for funding had been made
for “Communications Priorities”. This was for Gateway
signs to the district and media training.
CONCLUSION:
Panel members
expressed their concern to Cabinet on the bid for one-off budget
provision for “Communications Priorities”, and that
this bid should be removed.
A report was to be prepared on Special
Expense Areas to assess whether the net expenditure was fully
recovered.
ACTION
POINT:
At the first meeting
of the newly appointed Resources DSP
following the 2007 District Council elections, the report on
Special Expense Areas should undergo pre-decision scrutiny.
The Community DSP had requested information on the Building
Control Reserve. Scrutiny of this could be referred to the
Resources DSP.
There were concerns that any Local Area
Agreement could require the aligning of funds between all councils
in Lincolnshire. The District Council would need to look into
rationalising funding streams.
Grant funding of £10,000 for 2006/7
and £52,000 for 2007/8 had been received for the
implementation of smoke-free legislation.
Local Forums had been consulted on
proposed increases in council tax. Of the five that had taken
place, three were in favour of an increase of 4.9%, one was in
favour of an increase of 2.5% and the final one was closely
balanced.
No formal guidance on capping had been
received. Informal guidance stated that there was no power for the
government to cap district councils on the basis of parish
councils. ... view
the full minutes text for item 136.
137.
USE OF LEISURE CENTRES BY SCHOOLS
Share this item
The Panel will receive information on
Lincolnshire County Council’s contribution to district
councils for schools’ usage of leisure centres.
Minutes:
A
briefing note was circulated at the meeting.
The District Council had Chance to Share
Agreements in respect of the leisure centres in Bourne and the
Deepings. The agreements provided a basis for the allocation of
costs between users of the facilities.
Deepings Leisure Centre
The County Council were recharged on a quarterly
basis. The charge was agreed historically and index
linked.
For 2006/7 the County Council were recharged
£146,500; historically recharges had not exceeded
£150,000. Increasing utility costs could mean that recharges
would increase at a rate greater than inflation.
The County Council wanted to “cap”
their contribution to approximately £130,000.
The Deepings School are recharged for their use of
the leisure centre. They were not seeking to change the
arrangement.
Bourne
A Chance to Share Agreement was established with
the County Council in 1991. This arrangement passed to Bourne
Robert Manning Technology College when the Lincolnshire County
Council Budget was delegated to schools.
ACTION
POINT:
Officers should
continue to work with the County Council and provide an update for
the new Resources DSP in June 2007.
138.
IMPLEMENTATION OF RECOMMENDATIONS MADE DURING INTERNAL AUDIT
Share this item
The Panel will receive an update from the
Service Manager, Business Transformation and Information Management
on the implementation of recommendations made by
PricewaterhouseCoopers.(Attached)
Minutes:
At their meeting on 18th
January 2007, the Resources DSP
expressed concerns that not all recommendations made by internal
audit had been implemented.
Internal Audit had recommended that
testing of the TeamSpirit Payroll
system should be done in isolation of the production system in a
dedicated test environment to reduce risk to system integrity and
availability issues.
The Service Manager, Business
Transformation and Information Management explained why the
recommendation was not accepted. He was satisfied that there were
sufficient safeguards to protect the live system.
Members accepted the officer’s
explanation.
139.
RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGY AND RISK ACTION PLAN
Share this item
The Panel will scrutinise the amended Risk Management
Strategy and appended Risk Action Plan
Minutes:
The District Council’s Risk
Management Strategy was first approved in September
2004.
Changes had been made to the original
document:
The definition of risk had been
expanded.
A diagram demonstrating the risk
environment had been added, which showed that risk did not exist in
isolation.
The methodology for assessing and
categorising risk had been simplified. The new matrix aligned with
other local authorities across Lincolnshire.
It was proposed that a risk management
group should be set up.
Regular risk management reports were
proposed. An annual risk management report would be produced. This
would assess how effectively processes had been
embedded.
The Risk Management Strategy covered
every member of staff and elected member. A training programme for
staff and members was being developed.
Risks identified in service plans would
be collated and monitored.
An equalities impact assessment was
required for the Risk Management Strategy.
ACTION
POINT:
Risk Management
reports should become a standing item on the agenda for the
Resources DSP.
RECOMMENDATION:
1.The Resources DSP recommended
that a local performance indicator should be developed to show the
number of items at each level of risk: red, amber and
green.
2.The Resources DSP recommended
to the Assets and Resources Portfolio Holder, the adoption of the
amended Risk Management Strategy.
140.
REVIEW OF DELIVERY OF THE CAPITAL PROGRAMME
Share this item
Report CHFR32 and appendix on the
delivery of the Capital Programme.(Attached)
Minutes:
The focus of report CHFR32 was the
delivery of the capital programme for 2006/7.
Following a decision by Cabinet on
5th February 2007, the grant for Aire Road had been removed. Work was being done on
a new scheme.
Grants for the Stamford Gateway project
and the Northfields site in Market Deeping had rolled over to
2007/8.
£1.7 million was due to be spent on
Welham Street car park by the end of
March, 2007. Large invoices for steel and concrete were expected
before then.
The next meeting of the Capital Asset
Management Group on March 9th 2007 would review
proposals for charging machinery. Machinery would need to be
procured by the beginning of April.
ACTION
POINT:
1.The joint Resources DSP and
Economic DSP car parking working group
should meet as soon as possible after the Capital Asset Management
Group to discuss proposals for charging machinery.
2.The findings of the working group should be circulated to
all members of the Resources DSP.
·Assets and facilities
showed a significant underspend. Costs of security works and
asbestos removal works were not show because they had not been
coded. There would be approximately £250,000 that would not
be spent. This had been allocated as grant funding to Grantham
hospital but had not been needed.
141.
GATEWAY REVIEW FEEDBACK SESSION
Share this item
The Panel will consider the gateway
process for 2007/08 and make recommendations for
2008/09.(Attached)
Minutes:
Members of the DSP considered how successful the Gateway Review
process had been.
Arrangements had worked well within the
Resources DSP and other DSPs were generally pleased.
Gateways 1 and 2 were considered very
useful because more members of the Council could be involved in
developing the budget by concentrating on service plans and/or
financial information.
The format of Gateway 3 was questioned.
It was suggested that this should be signing-off work following
Gateways 1 and 2 and should be done by the Resources DSP.
Some of the first gateway reviews lacked
focus; a check list was prepared for the second and third gateway
reviews, which made members’ roles more clear.
Category M services should be provided
with a baseline total which they must not exceed to save officer
and member time removing growth bids.
A report on the Gateway reviews was to be
produced by the Corporate Head, Finance and Resources and the
relevant strategic director.
Service managers needed to work more
closely with Portfolio Holders.
The Scrutiny Officer was consulting with
other Lincolnshire authorities on their scrutiny of the budget
process. The findings would be presented to the Scrutiny
Co-ordinating Group
CONCLUSIONS
The Resources
DSP recommends that:
1.The Cabinet should provide Service Managers with an
indication of likely resources for budget preparation
purposes;
2.Gateways 1 and 2 should be completed in the same format as
those during 2006/7;
3.The third Gateway Review should consist of the Resources
DSP and one member from each other
DSPs,
signing off the work that had been done.
142.
BEST VALUE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Share this item
(Attached)
Minutes:
Noted.
143.
WORK PROGRAMME
Share this item
(Attached)
Minutes:
Noted.
ACTION
POINTS:
The
financial impact of LSVT should be
removed from the work programme.
The car
parking charges working group should be added to the work
programme.